Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article forms part of an ongoing debate on rights and the use of the term ‘indigenous’, which has so far included exchanges in Current Anthropology , the New Humanist , and ANTHROPOLOGY TODAY , as indicated in the bibliography. The authors here respond specifically to an article by Adam Kuper, published in Current Anthropology and the New Humanist . Professor Kuper has been invited to respond and has indicated his intention to do so in the forthcoming issue of ANTHROPOLOGY TODAY . Readers are invited to contribute their own views to the debate. [Ed.]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenrick et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: