Some researchers have recently argued that a four-factor structure best represents the Self-Consciousness Scale. The present study provides evidence that a three-factor structure is superior to a four-factor structure in accounting for the variability among items. The three-factor version of the scale is shown to provide a closer approximation to simple structure than the four-factor model. The three-factor solution is also relatively invariant across communality estimates and rotations, whereas the composition of the four-factor solution is more affected by these factor parameters. Finally, confirmatory factor analysis shows that the four-factor solution does not provide a closer fit to the data than the three-factor solution. General issues regarding the role of factor analysis in theory development are addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas W. Britt (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: