Key result
Once-weekly insulin icodec matches once-daily basal insulin for MACE and overall adverse events.
Why the study?
Does once-weekly insulin icodec have a similar safety profile compared to once-daily basal insulin in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,340)
Yes
Does once-weekly insulin icodec have a similar safety profile compared to once-daily basal insulin in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Once-weekly insulin icodec demonstrates a safety profile, including cardiovascular safety, similar to once-daily basal insulin comparators in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety profile of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec), focusing on aspects beyond hypoglycemia, in a pooled population from the ONWARDS phase 3a trials. METHODS: ONWARDS 1-6 investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec versus once-daily basal insulin comparators in insulin-naive and insulin-experienced adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and insulin-experienced adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Adverse event (AE) data from all trial periods were pooled. Hypersensitivity, injection-site reactions, and medication errors, as well as microvascular and macrovascular (including time to first major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]) complications, were among the safety areas evaluated. RESULTS: Total treatment exposure was 2118.70 and 2127.76 patient-years of exposure (PYE) in the icodec (n=2170) and comparator groups (n=2170), respectively. Adjusted rates (events/100 PYE) were similar for icodec and comparators for all AEs (248.49 vs 242.53), serious AEs (14.51 vs 14.03), and severe AEs (7.92 vs 7.50), respectively. Adjusted rates of hypersensitivity were 5.88 and 6.74 events/100 PYE in the icodec and comparator groups, respectively. Most injection-site reactions were mild; adjusted rates: 5.86 and 3.66 events/100 PYE, respectively. Medication error rates were 2.47 and 2.53 events/100 PYE, respectively. Time to first MACE was similar between groups (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.93 [0.56-1.56]). Adjusted rates for other AEs were broadly similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Based on a detailed evaluation of safety focus areas across the ONWARDS 1-6 trials, the safety profile of once-weekly icodec was generally similar to that of once-daily basal insulin comparators in individuals with T2D or T1D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajaj et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes (n=4,340). Once-weekly insulin icodec vs. Once-daily basal insulin comparators was evaluated on Time to first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.56-1.56). Once-weekly insulin icodec demonstrated a similar safety profile to once-daily basal insulin, with comparable rates of adverse events and time to first MACE (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.56-1.56).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: