Key result
Nitric oxide inhalation for measuring alveolar-capillary membrane diffusion is feasible in heart failure, with DL(NO) significantly reduced compared to healthy subjects (72.5 vs 88.6; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does nitric oxide inhalation provide comparable alveolar-capillary membrane diffusion estimates to carbon monoxide in heart failure patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
Does nitric oxide inhalation provide comparable alveolar-capillary membrane diffusion estimates to carbon monoxide in heart failure patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 72.5% vs 88.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Nitric oxide inhalation is a feasible method for measuring alveolar-capillary membrane diffusion in heart failure patients, providing results comparable to the traditional carbon monoxide method.
Supports DL(NO) feasibility in heart failure; leaves open advantages over DL(CO) or practice change.
BACKGROUND: In heart failure, lung diffusion is reduced, it correlates with prognosis and exercise capacity, and it is a therapy target. DESIGN: Diffusion is measured as CO total diffusion (DL(CO)), which has two components: membrane diffusion (Dm) and capillary volume, the latter related to CO and O2 competition for hemoglobin. DL(CO) needs to be corrected for hemoglobin. Diffusion can also be measured with NO (DL(NO)), which has a very high affinity for hemoglobin, and thus, the resistance of hemoglobin being trivial, it directly represents Dm. Therefore, Dm is directly calculated from DL(NO) through a correction factor. DL(NO) has never been measured in heart failure. The study aims at determining, in heart failure, DL(NO), Dm correction factor, and whether Dm(NO) provides Dm estimates comparable to Dm(CO). METHODS: We measured DL(CO), Dm(CO) by multi-maneuver Roughton-Forster method, and DL(CO) and DL(NO) by single-breath maneuver in 50 heart failure and 50 healthy subjects. RESULTS: DL(CO) was 21.9 ± 4.8 ml/mmHg per min and 16.8 ± 5.1 in healthy subjects and heart failure subjects, respectively (p < 0.001). DL(NO) was 88.6 ± 20.5 ml/mmHg per min and 72.5 ± 22.3, respectively (p < 0.001). The correction factors to obtain Dm from DL(NO) were 2.68 (entire population), 2.63 (healthy subjects) and 2.75 (heart failure subjects). Dm(CO) and Dm(NO) were 34.7 ± 10.9 ml/mmHg per min and 33.8 ± 7.6 in healthy subjects and 25.9 ± 2.0 and 26.4 ± 8.1 in heart failure subjects. CONCLUSIONS: DL(NO) and Dm(NO) measurements are feasible in heart failure. Dm(CO) and Dm(NO) provide comparable results. The correction factor to calculate Dm from DL(NO) in heart failure is 2.75, which is little different from the 2.63 value we observed in healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magini et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=100). Nitric oxide inhalation for diffusion measurement (DL(NO)) vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on DL(NO) (ml/mmHg per min) (p=<0.001). Nitric oxide inhalation for measuring alveolar-capillary membrane diffusion is feasible in heart failure, with DL(NO) significantly reduced compared to healthy subjects (72.5 vs 88.6; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: