Key result
Cerebral embolic protection using the TriGuard 3 system during TAVR in nonagenarians was feasible and safe, with no difference in clinical outcomes or access site complications compared to no CEPD.
Why the study?
Stroke remains a worrisome complication following TAVR, and the safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices during TAVR in nonagenarian patients required evaluation.
Does a cerebral embolic protection device (TriGuard 3) improve safety and reduce neurological complications in nonagenarian patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=51)
No
Does a cerebral embolic protection device (TriGuard 3) improve safety and reduce neurological complications in nonagenarian patients undergoing TAVR?
The use of the TriGuard 3 cerebral embolic protection device during TAVR in nonagenarians is feasible and safe, without increasing access site complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support safe TriGuard 3 use in nonagenarian TAVR; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves the survival and life quality of nonagenarian patients with aortic stenosis. Stroke remains one of the most worrisome complications following TAVR. Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) may reduce neurological complications after TAVR. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of CEPDs during TAVR in nonagenarian patients. METHODS: Between January 2018 and October 2021, 869 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) at our center. Of these, 51 (5.9%) patients were older than ninety years. In 33 consecutive nonagenarian patients, TF-TAVR was implanted without CEPDs using balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expandable valves (SEVs). Eighteen consecutive nonagenarians underwent TF-TAVR using a CEPD (CP group). Follow up period was in-hospital or 30 days after the procedure, respectively. RESULTS: Minor access site complications occurred in two patients (3.9%) and were not CEPD-associated. Postinterventional delirium occurred in nine patients (17.6%). Periprocedural minor non-disabling stroke and delirium occurred in ten patients (19.6%). Periprocedural major fatal stroke occurred in two patients in the BEV group (3.9%). Two patients in the BEV group died due to postinterventional pneumonia with sepsis. The mortality rate was 7.8%. The results did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Age alone is no longer a contraindication for TAVR. CEPD using the Triguard 3 system in nonagenarian TAVR patients was feasible and safe and did not increase access site complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lind et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Severe Aortic Stenosis (n=51). Cerebral embolic protection device (TriGuard 3 System) vs. No cerebral embolic protection device was evaluated on Safety and efficacy (neurological complications, access site complications, mortality). Cerebral embolic protection using the TriGuard 3 system during TAVR in nonagenarians was feasible and safe, with no difference in clinical outcomes or access site complications compared to no CEPD.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: