Key result
Automated CNN for LA MRI segmentation matches human accuracy with a 0.90 Dice score.
Why the study?
Real time 2D phase contrast MRI enables flow quantification in AF, but analysis requires time-consuming anatomical contouring across numerous cardiac frames.
Does a convolutional neural network accurately automate left atrial segmentation and flow quantification compared to semi-manual analysis in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=44)
No
Does a convolutional neural network accurately automate left atrial segmentation and flow quantification compared to semi-manual analysis in patients with atrial fibrillation?
A deep learning convolutional neural network can accurately and rapidly automate left atrial segmentation and flow quantification from real-time phase contrast MRI in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports automated LA analysis in AF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Real time 2D phase contrast (RTPC) MRI is useful for flow quantification in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, but data analysis requires time-consuming anatomical contouring for many cardiac time frames. Our goal was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for fully automated left atrial (LA) flow quantification. Forty-four AF patients underwent cardiac MRI including LA RTPC, collecting a median of 358 timeframes per scan. 15,307 semi-manual derived RTPC LA contours comprised ground truth for CNN training, validation, and testing. CNN vs. human performance was assessed using Dice scores (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and flow measures (stasis, velocities, flow). LA contour DSC across all patients were similar to human inter-observer DSC (0.90 vs. 0.93) and a median 4.6 mm [3.5-5.9 mm] HD. There was no impact of heart rate variability on contouring quality (low vs. high variability DSC: 0.92 ± 0.05 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p = 0.95). CNN based LA flow quantification showed good to excellent agreement with semi-manual analysis (r > 0.90) and small bias in Bland-Altman analysis for mean velocity (-0.10 cm/s), stasis (1%), and net flow (-2.4 ml/s). This study demonstrated the feasibility of CNN based LA flow analysis with good agreements in LA contours and flow measures and resilience to heartbeat variability in AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baraboo et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=44). Convolutional neural network (CNN) for automated LA segmentation vs. Semi-manual human contouring was evaluated on Dice score (DSC) for LA contouring accuracy. A convolutional neural network for automated left atrial segmentation and flow quantification in real-time phase contrast MRI achieved a Dice score of 0.90, comparable to human inter-observer agreement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: