Key result
Dihydropyridine CCBs were associated with a significantly higher incidence of end-stage renal disease compared to ACEIs or ARBs in patients with CKD (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.05-1.48; p=0.01).
Why the study?
Do dihydropyridine CCBs compared to ACEIs or ARBs affect the incidence of ESRD and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=25,647)
Do dihydropyridine CCBs compared to ACEIs or ARBs affect the incidence of ESRD and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Effect estimate: OR 1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.48)
p-value: p=0.01
In patients with CKD, dihydropyridine CCBs are associated with a higher risk of ESRD compared to ACEIs or ARBs, though all-cause mortality is similar.
ACEIs/ARBs may be preferred over dihydropyridine CCBs to lower ESRD risk in CKD; extends comparative renal protection data in >25,000 patients.
BACKGROUND: The renoprotective effect of inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been identified through placebo-controlled trials. However, the effect of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) on renal system is still controversial. Our current meta-analysis includes available evidences to compare the effect of dihydropyridine CCBs and ACEIs or ARBs on renal outcomes and mortality. We also further investigate whether CCBs can be used in combination with inhibitors of RAS to improve the prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched up to July 2012, for clinical randomized controlled trials, assessing the effect of dihydropyridine CCBs on the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality in contrast to ACEIs or ARBs. Eight clinical trials were included containing 25,647 participants. ESRD showed significantly higher frequency with CCBs therapy compared with ACEIs or ARBs therapy, though blood pressure was decreased similarly in both groups in every trial (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.48; p = 0.01). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause mortality between these two groups, though ACEIs or ARBs exhibited better renoprotective effect compared to CCBs (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.03; p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: CCBs did not increase all-cause mortality incidence in patients with CKD though they displayed weaker renoprotective, compared to ACEIs or ARBs therapy. Our results suggest the combination of a CCB and an ACEI or ARB should be a preferable antihypertensive therapy in patients with CKD, considering their higher effect in decreasing blood pressure and fewer adverse metabolic problems caused.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=25,647). dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) vs. ACEIs or ARBs was evaluated on incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.48, p=0.01). Dihydropyridine CCBs were associated with a significantly higher incidence of end-stage renal disease compared to ACEIs or ARBs in patients with CKD (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.05-1.48; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: