Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study investigated the relative validity of the conventional pretest-posttest design and the retrospective pretest-posttest design using self-report measures as outcome criteria. As predicted the experimental training in Seeing Problems Strategy was effective in improving subjects’ task performance. Traditional self-report pre-post comparison did not reflect this actual change of performance, whereas the retrospective self-report approach did. Comparison of pretest mean scores and retrospective pretest mean scores indicated that subjects initially over-estimated their performance. This result represents further evidence on the validity of the response-shift notion as introduced by Howard et al. (8) and supports earlier research in showing that the retrospective pretest is a valid means to control for this source of contamination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joh. Hoogstraten (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: