Key result
Passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia showed preserved vascular function in spinal cord injury after normalizing for thigh muscle volume (104 vs 120 mL min-1 L-1 in controls).
Why the study?
Does passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia demonstrate preserved peripheral vascular function in individuals with spinal cord injury compared to age-matched controls?
Observational (n=16)
Does passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia demonstrate preserved peripheral vascular function in individuals with spinal cord injury compared to age-matched controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 126% vs 515%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Peripheral vascular impairment is not an obligatory accompaniment to spinal cord injury when accounting for differences in muscle volume.
Supports preserved vascular function in SCI after muscle volume adjustment; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
UNLABELLED: A spinal cord injury (SCI) clearly results in greater cardiovascular risk; however, accompanying changes in peripheral vascular structure below the lesion mean that the real impact of a SCI on vascular function is unclear. AIM: Therefore, utilizing passive leg movement-induced (PLM) hyperaemia, an index of nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vascular function and the central hemodynamic response to this intervention, we studied eight individuals with a SCI and eight age-matched controls (CTRL). METHODS: Specifically, we assessed heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), leg blood flow (LBF) and thigh composition. RESULTS: In CTRL, passive movement transiently decreased MAP and increased HR and CO from baseline by 2.5 ± 1 mmHg, 7 ± 2 bpm and 0.5 ± 0.1 L min(-1) respectively. In SCI, HR and CO responses were unidentifiable. LBF increased to a greater extent in CTRL (515 ± 41 ∆mL min(-1)) compared with SCI, (126 ± 25 ∆mL min(-1)) (P < 0.05). There was a strong relationship between ∆LBF and thigh muscle volume (r = 0.95). After normalizing ∆LBF for this strong relationship (∆LBF/muscle volume), there was evidence of preserved vascular function in SCI (CTRL: 120 ± 9; SCI 104 ± 11 mL min(-1) L(-1)). A comparison of ∆LBF in the passively moved and stationary leg, to partition the contribution of the blood flow response, implied that 35% of the hyperaemia resulted from cardioacceleration in the CTRL, whereas all the hyperaemia appeared peripheral in origin in the SCI. CONCLUSION: Thus, utilizing PLM-induced hyperaemia as marker of vascular function, it is evident that peripheral vascular impairment is not an obligatory accompaniment to a SCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venturelli et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Spinal cord injury (n=16). Passive leg movement vs. Age-matched controls was evaluated on Change in leg blood flow (∆LBF) (p=< 0.05). Passive leg movement-induced hyperaemia showed preserved vascular function in spinal cord injury after normalizing for thigh muscle volume (104 vs 120 mL min-1 L-1 in controls).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: