What does this research mean for the field?

A re-examination of the evidence from a recent meta-analysis is necessary to verify whether implantable peripheral nerve stimulation truly provides clinically meaningful analgesic outcomes for chronic pain. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

May 28, 2026Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine1 citations

View Full Paper

Implantable peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain: a re-reading into a meta-analysis and a re-examination of evidence

SHSameh M. HakimAin Shams University SNSamer NarouzeUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We read with great interest the recent publication by D’Souza et al ,11 titled “Implantable peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesic outcomes up to 24 months.” They concluded that their results demonstrated clinically meaningful

问 AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

问 AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Implantable peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain: a re-reading into a meta-analysis and a re-examination of evidence

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider