This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
SUMMARY: Protein quality assessment is a long-standing problem in bioinformatics. For more than a decade we have developed state-of-art predictors by carefully selecting and optimising inputs to a machine learning method. The correlation has increased from 0.60 in ProQ to 0.81 in ProQ2 and 0.85 in ProQ3 mainly by adding a large set of carefully tuned descriptions of a protein. Here, we show that a substantial improvement can be obtained using exactly the same inputs as in ProQ2 or ProQ3 but replacing the support vector machine by a deep neural network. This improves the Pearson correlation to 0.90 (0.85 using ProQ2 input features). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ProQ3D is freely available both as a webserver and a stand-alone program at http://proq3.bioinfo.se/. CONTACT: arne@bioinfo.se. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uziela et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: