Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We build an occupational-choice general-equilibrium model with for-profit firms, non-profit organizations and endogenous private warm-glow donations. Lack of monitoring on the use of funds implies that an increase of funds of the non-profit sector (because of a higher incomein the for-profit sector, a stronger preference for giving, or an inflow of foreign aid) worsens the motivational composition and performance of the non-profit sector. We also analyze the conditions under which donors (through linking donations to the motivational composition of the non-profit sector), non-profits themselves (through peer monitoring), or the government (using a tax-financed public funding of non-profits) can eliminate the low-effectiveness equilibrium. We present supporting case-study evidence from humanitarian emergencies and developing-country NGO sector and humanitarian emergencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldashev et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: