Key result
Applying respiratory rate estimation algorithms designed for contact photoplethysmography to remote photoplethysmography signals achieved a mean absolute error below 3 breaths-per-minute.
Why the study?
Remote photoplethysmography enables non-contact respiratory rate measurement, but lower signal quality compared with contact methods necessitates assessing algorithm performance.
Algorithms designed for contact PPG can be successfully adapted for remote PPG to estimate respiratory rate with low error margins.
May enable contactless respiratory monitoring; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
The respiratory rate is important information in the healthcare environment. Consequently, research is done to develop a device that could measure the respiratory rate continuously with non-contact devices. Various methods were tried, such as radio-based, thermal imaging or remote photoplethysmography (rPPG). The rPPG method uses a video recording of the skin in ambient light conditions. It measures the small variations of light reflection induced by the amount of blood in vessels. This method allows the extraction of physiological parameters such as the heart rate or respiratory rate without any contact with the skin. The main issue with the rPPG technique is the lower signal quality compared with contact-based methods. In this paper, we assess the performance of the respiratory rate estimation algorithms with rPPG signals. The tested algorithms were designed for contact-PPG signals input. The use of the algorithms designed for contact PPG on remote PPG signals can lead to respiratory rate estimations with a mean absolute error below 3 breaths-per-minute. We benchmark our results using this standard and some other metrics to interpret the quality of the assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luguern et al. (2020) studied Respiratory rate estimation. Algorithms designed for contact-PPG applied to remote PPG signals was evaluated on Mean absolute error of respiratory rate estimations. Applying respiratory rate estimation algorithms designed for contact photoplethysmography to remote photoplethysmography signals achieved a mean absolute error below 3 breaths-per-minute.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: