Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper defends a counterfactual account of explanation, according to which successful explanation requires tracing patterns of counterfactual dependence of a special sort, involving what I call active counterfactuals. Explanations having this feature must appeal to generalizations that are invariant—stable under certain sorts of changes. These ideas are illustrated by examples drawn from physics and econometrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jim Woodward (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: