Key result
A model combining clinical and electrocardiographic variables predicted atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87).
Why the study?
Detecting atrial fibrillation after ischaemic stroke is challenging due to its paroxysmal nature.
Does a combined clinical, electrocardiographic, and genetic variable model predict the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients after ischemic stroke or TIA?
Cohort (n=709)
No
Does a combined clinical, electrocardiographic, and genetic variable model predict the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients after ischemic stroke or TIA?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A model combining clinical and electrocardiographic variables provides robust prediction of incident atrial fibrillation in post-stroke patients, whereas the addition of genetic markers (SNPs) does not improve predictive utility.
INTRODUCTION: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging in patients after ischaemic stroke due to its paroxysmal nature. We aimed to determine the utility of a combined clinical, electrocardiographic, and genetic variable model to predict AF in a post-stroke population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cohort study at a single comprehensive stroke centre from November 09, 2009, to October 31, 2017. All patients recruited were diagnosed with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attacks. Electrocardiographic variables including p-wave terminal force (PWTF), corrected QT interval (QTc), and genetic variables including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the 4q25 (rs2200733) were evaluated. Clinical, electrocardiographic and genetic variables of patients without AF and those who developed AF were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics were performed to identify parameters and determine their ability to predict the occurrence of AF. RESULTS: Out of 709 patients (median age of 59 years, inter-quartile range 52-67) recruited, sixty (8.5%) were found to develop AF on follow-up. Age (odds ratio [OR]): 3.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03-5.98, p < 0.0001), hypertension (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.36-5.63, p = 0.0052), and valvular heart disease (OR: 8.49, 95% CI: 2.62-27.6, p < 0.004) were the strongest predictors of AF, with an area under receiver operating value of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.82), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87) when electrocardiographic variables (PWTF and QTc) were added. SNP did not improve prediction modelling. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that a model combining clinical and electrocardiographic variables provided robust prediction of AF in our post-stroke population. Role of SNP in prediction of AF was limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poh et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attacks (n=709). Combined clinical and electrocardiographic variable model vs. Clinical variables alone was evaluated on occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.87). A model combining clinical and electrocardiographic variables predicted atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: