Key result
Direct acting oral anticoagulants lack specific safety and effectiveness evidence in clinically complex nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation, highlighting a critical research gap.
Why the study?
Are direct acting oral anticoagulants safe and effective compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation?
Are direct acting oral anticoagulants safe and effective compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation?
This review highlights the critical gap in evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of direct acting oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in clinically complex nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lack of specific evidence warrants caution with DOACs in complex nursing home AF residents; leaves open need for dedicated safety and efficacy trials.
Atrial fibrillation affects ~1 in 6 long-term nursing home residents. After an ischemic stroke hospitalization, ~2/3 of nursing home residents receive skilled nursing care and functional independence continues to decline, a process often complicated by rehospitalization and stroke recurrence. Due to advanced age and multimorbidity, anticoagulation is indicated for essentially all nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation. Yet as the severity of cognitive and/or functional deficits increases, the net clinical benefit of anticoagulation becomes less certain. Therefore, nursing home residents are most likely to be in need of supportive clinical evidence regarding anticoagulation, but least likely to have risk/benefit information from trials. Approximately half of US nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation have been treated with warfarin historically. Trial evidence in ambulatory older adults supports a large relative risk reduction (~50%) for stroke with warfarin versus aspirin and generally comparable bleeding risk. However, nursing home residents have a complex confluence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy that distinguishes them from healthier, non-institutionalized trial populations. Exemplifying this distinction, maintaining nursing home residents treated with warfarin within the therapeutic range has been a challenge historically, increasing the risk of adverse events. The direct acting oral anticoagulants may be a preferred therapeutic option for an indeterminate fraction of nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation. A review of the literature on anticoagulant use in nursing homes underscores the need for evidence on the effectiveness and safety of the direct acting oral anticoagulants specific to clinically complex older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alcusky et al. (2018) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Direct acting oral anticoagulants vs. Warfarin was evaluated. Direct acting oral anticoagulants lack specific safety and effectiveness evidence in clinically complex nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation, highlighting a critical research gap.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: