An optimisation-based iterative block matching algorithm significantly reduces displacement and strain measurement errors in speckle tracking echocardiography compared to standard block matching on synthetic datasets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduces synthetic tracking errors; leaves open validation for clinical echocardiography.
Speckle tracking is the most prominent technique used to estimate the regional movement of the heart based on echocardiograms. In this study, we propose an optimised-based block matching algorithm to perform speckle tracking iteratively. The proposed technique was evaluated using a publicly available synthetic echocardiographic dataset with known ground-truth from several major vendors and for healthy/ischaemic cases. The results were compared with the results from the classic (standard) two-dimensional block matching. The proposed method presented an average displacement error of 0.57 pixels, while classic block matching provided an average error of 1.15 pixels. When estimating the segmental/regional longitudinal strain in healthy cases, the proposed method, with an average of 0.32 ± 0.53, outperformed the classic counterpart, with an average of 3.43 ± 2.84. A similar superior performance was observed in ischaemic cases. This method does not require any additional ad hoc filtering process. Therefore, it can potentially help to reduce the variability in the strain measurements caused by various post-processing techniques applied by different implementations of the speckle tracking. Graphical Abstract Standard block matching versus proposed iterative block matching approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azarmehr et al. (2020) studied Myocardial deformation. Optimised-based block matching algorithm vs. Classic (standard) two-dimensional block matching was evaluated on Average displacement error (pixels).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: