Key result
Irrigation of appendectomy wounds with 1% povidone-iodine significantly reduced surgical site infections compared to no irrigation (28.4% vs 38.4%; P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does wound irrigation with 1% povidone-iodine reduce surgical site infection in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis?
RCT (n=120)
Randomized
No
Does wound irrigation with 1% povidone-iodine reduce surgical site infection in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.4% vs 38.4%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Simple irrigation of appendectomy wounds with 1% povidone-iodine significantly reduces the rate of surgical site infection and pus formation.
Supports routine 1% povidone-iodine irrigation in appendectomy; confirms benefit in acute appendicitis.
Objective: Evaluating the effects of Povidone- Iodine against the surgical site infection in post- appendectomy wound infection. Study design: Randomized clinical trial Place and duration: Department of Surgery, Isra University Hospital Hyderabad from January 2016 to December 2017. Subjects and Methods: Patients of acute appendicitis with classical clinical presentation were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. 60 patients were those in which wound was irrigated with 1% povidone-iodine solution versus 60 patients in whom wound not irrigated with it before skin closure. Data was analyzed on SPSS 22.0 using Student t-test and Chi- square test respectively. Data was analyzed at 95% confidence interval (P=0.05). P-value of =0.05 was taken statistically. Results: Mean ± SD age of control and cases was noted as 22.5 ± 7.5 and 23.5 ± 6.5 years respectively (P=0.86). Male and female population in control and cases were noted as 45 (75%) and 15 (25%) & 47 (78.33%) and 13 (21.66%) respectively (P >0.05). Grade 4 pus discharging wound infection was noted in 3.33% in control compared to 1.66% in cases (P= 0.87). Normal wound healing (grad 0) was noted in 37 (61.6%) and 43 (71.6%) of control and cases respectively. In control grade 1-4 lesions were noted in 38.4% compared to 28.4% in cases (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Simple irrigation of appendectomy wound with 1% povidone- iodine significantly prevents against the surgical site infection and pus formation
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhanbhro et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in acute appendicitis (n=120). povidone-iodine solution vs. no irrigation was evaluated on surgical site infection (grade 1-4 lesions) (p=< 0.05). Irrigation of appendectomy wounds with 1% povidone-iodine significantly reduced surgical site infections compared to no irrigation (28.4% vs 38.4%; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: