Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since the bacterial ability to develop resistance against various factors of their surroundings is a well-known phenomenon, resistance against iodine and specifically against povidone-iodine (PVP-I) has been widely investigated. Yet there is little known about bacterial resistance in long-term daily use of disinfectants in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. The aim of our study was to investigate whether on daily use of PVP-I over a period of at least 6 months coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS)--the predominant infective organisms of peritonitis--developed resistance against PVP-I. At the catheter exit site of 40 CAPD patients we isolated 36 CNS. 23 CNS (CNS + PVP) orginate from patients using PVP-I, 13 CNS (CNS + CI) from patients using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as disinfectant. The strains were biotyped, antibiotic resistance patterns were determined and resistance against PVP-I or NaOCl was calculated as reduction factor using the quantitative suspension test combined with a turbidimetric standardization. Resistance against PVP-I 0.01% and against NaOCl 0.005% was determined at two contact times (30 and 300 s) for each patient group. In addition, we investigated the effects of plasmid loss on sensitivity to PVP-I. Out of 5 multiple-antibiotic-resistant CNS, 3 strains showed no difference in reduction factor against PVP-I before and after curing. There was no significant difference in reduction factor against NaOCl. CNS + PVP were even significantly more sensitive to PVP-I than CNS + Cl. Taken together, our results demonstrate that long-term use of PVP-I does not cause any bacterial resistance in CNS of CAPD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klossner et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: