Why the study?
Does transvenous pacemaker implantation performed after hours increase the rate of major complications compared to during business hours in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block?
Does transvenous pacemaker implantation performed after hours increase the rate of major complications compared to during business hours in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block?
After-hours transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs is associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications, particularly infections, compared to procedures performed during normal business hours.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
After-hours implantation was associated with higher major complications in dogs; leaves open whether timing or staffing drives risk and warrants prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs is associated with a relatively high complication rate. At our institution, pacemaker implantation in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block (HG-AVB) frequently is performed as an after-hours emergency. HYPOTHESIS: Among dogs with HG-AVB, the rate of major complications is higher when pacemakers are implanted after hours (AH) compared to during business hours (BH). ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs with HG-AVB that underwent transvenous pacemaker implantation between January 2002 and December 2012 at the North Carolina State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. METHODS: Retrospective medical record review. Two-year follow-up was required for complications analysis. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 14/79 dogs (18%) and included lead dislodgement, lead or generator infection, lead or generator migration, and pacing failure. Incidence of major complications was significantly higher AH (10/36, 28%) compared to BH (4/43, 9%; P = .041), and all infectious complications occurred AH. Median survival time for all dogs was 27 months and did not differ between AH and BH groups for either all-cause (P = .70) or cardiac (P = .40) mortality. AH dogs were younger than BH dogs (P = .010), but there were no other clinically relevant differences between BH and AH groups in terms of demographic, clinical, or procedural variables. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: At our institution, AH transvenous pacemaker placement is associated with a higher rate of major complications (especially infections) compared to BH placement. This difference may be because of a variety of human factor differences AH versus BH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ward et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: