Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the relationship between physiological data and reported sensory experiences during two types of recovery methods following a handball training session.
Does cold water immersion improve physiological recovery and sensory experiences compared to passive recovery in female handball players after a training session?
Does cold water immersion improve physiological recovery and sensory experiences compared to passive recovery in female handball players after a training session?
Cold water immersion after training enhances parasympathetic activity and reduces muscle soreness, which correlates with positive sensory experiences in athletes.
May support CWI in female athlete recovery protocols; leaves open generalizability and performance impact pending larger trials.
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the physiological data from subjects and their reported sensory experiences during two types of recovery methods following a handball training session. Female handball players (average age: 21.4 ± 1.3 years; weight: 59.2 ± 3.3 kg; height: 158 ± 3 cm; body mass index, 23.4 ± 2.0 kg.m-2) carried out an athletic training session (rating of perceived exertion RPE: 14.70 ± 0.89) with either a passive recovery (PR) period or cold water immersion (CWI) for 14 minutes) (cross-over design). Physiological data were collected during the recovery period: CWI had a greater effect than PR on heart rate (HR; bpm), the higher frequencies (HF) of heart rate variability (HRV: 46.44 ± 21.50 vs 24.12 ± 17.62), delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS: 1.37 ± 0.51 vs 2.12 ± 1.25) and various reported emotional sensations. Spectrum HRV analysis showed a significant increase in HF during CWI. Sensorial experiences during the recovery periods were gathered from verbatim reports 24 hours later. Players’ comments about CWI revealed a congruence between the physiological data and sensorial reports. They used words such as: “thermal shock”, “regeneration”, “resourcefulness”, “dynamism” and “disappearance of pain” to describe their sensations. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the link between physiological and experiential data during CWI and we propose that action of the parasympathetic system on the autonomic nervous system can, at least in part, explain the observed correlations between the corporeal data measured and the sensorial experiences reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L’Hermette et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: