Why the study?
Does strain rate imaging correlate with coronary flow reserve to predict myocardial viability in patients with acute ST-elevation MI?
Does strain rate imaging correlate with coronary flow reserve to predict myocardial viability in patients with acute ST-elevation MI?
Myocardial deformation determined by strain rate imaging correlates with microvascular integrity (CFR) and can noninvasively predict myocardial viability after acute MI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive viability assessment post-MI; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between strain rate (SR) imaging and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in assessing viability of akinetic myocardium after acute myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Forty patients with acute first ST-elevation MI were analyzed. SR imaging and CFR by intracoronary flow measurement were obtained on the same day, 3~5 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Viability of the akinetic myocardium was determined on 6-week echocardiography. RESULTS: Systolic SR (SRs, -0.42 ± 0.10 vs. -0.35 ± 0.11 per second, P = 0.03), early diastolic SR (SRe, 0.68 ± 0.31 vs. 0.41 ± 0.22 per second, P = 0.003), and systolic strain (Ss, -5.9 ± 3.4 vs. -2.5 ± 4.0%, P = 0.04) were greater in akinetic, but viable myocardium of 21 patients than in akinetic and nonviable myocardium of 19 patients. CFR was also higher in patients with akinetic, but viable myocardium (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5, P < 0.001). SRs, SRe, and Ss were significantly related to CFR (r =-0.50, r = 0.58, r =-0.56, respectively, all P ≤ 0.001) and SRe was most related to CFR (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity to predict myocardial viability were 85.7% and 68.4% for CFR (cutoff = 1.75), and 90.5% and 57.9% for SRe (cutoff = 0.37 per second), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of myocardial deformation determined by SR imaging was related to the degree of microvascular integrity determined by CFR, and can be used as a noninvasive method to predict myocardial viability after acute MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: