Key result
Non-invasive coronary flow reserve <1.7 after successful primary angioplasty for anterior STEMI predicted left ventricular adverse remodeling with 100% sensitivity and 62% specificity.
Why the study?
Does non-invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) predict left ventricular adverse remodelling after successful primary angioplasty for anterior STEMI?
Observational (n=65)
Does non-invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) predict left ventricular adverse remodelling after successful primary angioplasty for anterior STEMI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-invasive coronary flow reserve measured within 24 hours of successful primary angioplasty for anterior STEMI is an independent predictor of left ventricular adverse remodeling at 6 months.
AIMS: To assess the usefulness of non-invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) to predict left ventricular adverse remodelling (LVR) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five consecutive patients (mean age 58 +/- 13 years, 24 women) with a first anterior STEMI, underwent prospectively CFR in the distal part of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), using intravenous adenosine infusion (0.14 mg/kg/min, within 2 min), and a standard echocardiography during the same exam, performed within 24 h after successful primary coronary angioplasty, and 6 months later, while the patients were in stable haemodynamic situation. CFR was defined as the peak hyperaemic LAD flow velocity divided by the baseline flow velocity. LV end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured using the biplane Simpson's rule. LVR was defined as an absolute increase of ESV > or =15%. Compared with patients without LVR, patients with LVR (n = 18) had higher peak troponin T levels, wall motion score (WMS), a worse initial angiographic TIMI flow grade, and less improved electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution (all P < 0.05), and lower CFR (1.43 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.97 +/- 0.5, P < 0.01). At 6 months, patients with LVR had higher WMS, ESV, EDV, and lower LVEF compared with patients without LVR (all P < 0.01). Furthermore, acute CFR was significantly correlated to the 6-month LVEF and ESV, and to change of LVEF and ESV (all P < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, acute CFR and initial angiographic TIMI flow grade were the independent predictors of LVR (all P < or = 0.01). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that a cut-off value of 1.7 for CFR yields a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 62% to predict LVR at follow-up (P < 0.001, area under the curve 0.82). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive CFR is an independent predictor of LVR after successful primary angioplasty of anterior STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meimoun et al. (2010) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=65). Non-invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) vs. Higher CFR was evaluated on Left ventricular adverse remodelling (LVR) defined as an absolute increase of ESV ≥15% (AUC 0.82, p=<0.001). Non-invasive coronary flow reserve <1.7 after successful primary angioplasty for anterior STEMI predicted left ventricular adverse remodeling with 100% sensitivity and 62% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: