This article presents the key aspects of the concept of managing the development of artifi-cial intelligence technologies, based on the assumption of reducing the threat of a potential intelligent machine rebellion. The content of this article is based on the idea that AI devel-opment brings great benefits, but also raises concerns, including the possibility of a poten-tial rebellion by intelligent machines. Autonomous AI systems, capable of making deci-sions without human involvement, raise questions about their potential to act against human interests. Visions of such threats, present in science fiction literature, have gained relevance in light of advancements in machine learning and robotics. These concerns relate to the possibility that AI could independently develop and modify its algorithms, exceeding human control. Therefore, the management of AI technology development should be carried out in such a way as to effectively reduce the threats of a potential rebellion by intelligent machines and limit the risks of negative consequences resulting from an overly liberal, uncontrolled development of AI technology applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prokopowicz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: