Why the study?
Respiratory activity is a vital life activity, making respiratory state detection of great practical significance based on the correlation between tidal volume and abdominal displacement changes.
Does a method using abdominal displacement data accurately detect respiratory status?
Does a method using abdominal displacement data accurately detect respiratory status?
A method using abdominal displacement data and a support vector machine classifier can accurately detect respiratory status with 90.23% accuracy, offering a low-cost and simplified monitoring approach.
May enable low-cost continuous respiratory monitoring; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
Respiratory activity is the most important basic life activity of human body, respiratory state detection is of great practical significance. Based on the characteristic of high correlation between the change of tidal volume and the change of abdominal displacement, a method of detecting respiratory status through abdominal displacement data is proposed. The method uses a gas pressure sensor to collect the tidal volume in the steady state of the subject once, which is used as the baseline data. The abdominal displacement data of the subject in the three breathing states of slow breathing, steady breathing and rapid breathing were collected with an acceleration sensor. The warp path distance between the lung and abdominal data in the three different states was calculated, this warp path distance together with the period extracted from the abdominal data is used as a two-dimensional feature and input to the support vector machine classifier. The experiments show that the accuracy of the classification results reaches 90.23%. The method only needs to measure the lung data once in smooth breathing state, and the subsequent continuous detection is achieved by measuring the displacement of the abdomen only. This method has the advantages of stable and reliable acquisition results, low implementation cost and simplified wearing method, and has high practicality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: