Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The clinical results in 107 patients receiving a peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) from HLA-A, -B, and -DR-compatible unrelated donors were compared to 107 matched controls receiving unrelated bone marrow (BM) transplants. Engraftment was achieved in 94% of the patients in both groups. The PBSC graft contained significantly more nucleated cells, CD34(+), CD3(+), and CD56(+) cells (P <.001), and resulted in a significantly shorter time-to-neutrophil (15 versus 19 days) and platelet engraftment (20 versus 27 days), compared to the BM control group (P <.001). Probabilities of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV were 35% and 32% (not significant [NS]) and of chronic GVHD 61% and 76% (NS) in the PBSC and BM groups, respectively. There was no difference between the 2 groups in bacteremia, cytomegalovirus reactivation or disease, and fungal infection. The 3-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) rates were 42% in the PBSC group and 31% in the BM controls (P =.7) and the survival rates were 46% and 51%, respectively. The probability of relapse was 25% and 31% in both groups (NS), resulting in disease-free survival rates of 43% in the PBSC group and 46% in the BM controls (NS). In the multivariate analysis, early disease, acute GVHD grade 0 to I, and presence of chronic GVHD were independent factors associated with a better disease-free survival in this study. PBSC from HLA-compatible unrelated donors can be used safely as an alternative to BM for stem cell transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Remberger et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: