Does long-term variability in SBP, DBP, and PP predict cardiovascular diseases?
Long-term variability in systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure independently predicts cardiovascular disease risk and improves the predictive value of risk models, with SBP variability being the strongest predictor.
Background and Objective: We aimed to compare the predictive value of long-term variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) over a 10-year period for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Methods: A prospective cohort of 44,938 participants were categorized into four groups based on the quartiles of variability of SBP, DBP, and PP. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to assess the impact of SBP, DBP, and PP variability on CVDs. The predictive value of SBP, DBP, and PP variability for CVDs and specific cardiovascular outcomes was evaluated based on the China-PAR model. Results: < 0.01). Conclusion: Increases in SBP, DBP, and PP variability independently elevate the risk of CVDs and its subtypes, regardless of absolute blood pressure levels. Furthermore, SBP, DBP, and PP variability can improve the predictive value of the China-PAR model for CVDs risk, with SBP variability demonstrating the strongest predictive capacity.
Chen et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: