Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
My aim in this article is to improve the methodology of the modernist constructivist approach and to provide a more coherent, rigid, and systematic constructivist framework for research. I do this by combining the methods of process tracing, discourse analysis, and counterfactuals. In addition, I aim to provide clearer methodological criteria for the evaluation of constructivist research by modifying some of the positivist criteria and adding the criterion of contextual validity. I assert that a more coherent methodology will strengthen and improve constructivist study and may contribute to better communication between constructivist and positivist scholars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amir Lupovici (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: