Why the study?
The Gupta score for predicting intra/post-operative myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest has been criticized for unreliable calibration and including a wide spectrum of unrelated operations.
Does a novel machine learning model improve the prediction of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest after major operations compared to the Gupta score?
Does a novel machine learning model improve the prediction of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest after major operations compared to the Gupta score?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel machine learning model outperformed the traditional Gupta score in predicting perioperative myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest across a heterogeneous range of major operations.
INTRODUCTION: Accurate prediction of complications often informs shared decision-making. Derived over 10 years ago to enhance prediction of intra/post-operative myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest (MI/CA), the Gupta score has been criticized for unreliable calibration and inclusion of a wide spectrum of unrelated operations. In the present study, we developed a novel machine learning (ML) model to estimate perioperative risk of MI/CA and compared it to the Gupta score. METHODS: Patients undergoing major operations were identified from the 2016-2020 ACS-NSQIP. The Gupta score was calculated for each patient, and a novel ML model was developed to predict MI/CA using ACS NSQIP-provided data fields as covariates. Discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (Brier score) of the ML model were compared to the existing Gupta score within the entire cohort and across operative subgroups. RESULTS: Of 2,473,487 patients included for analysis, 25,177 (1.0%) experienced MI/CA (55.2% MI, 39.1% CA, 5.6% MI and CA). The ML model, which was fit using a randomly selected training cohort, exhibited higher discrimination within the testing dataset compared to the Gupta score (C-statistic 0.84 vs 0.80, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the ML model had significantly better calibration in the entire cohort (Brier score 0.0097 vs 0.0100). Model performance was markedly improved among patients undergoing thoracic, aortic, peripheral vascular and foregut surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The present ML model outperformed the Gupta score in the prognostication of MI/CA across a heterogenous range of operations. Given the growing integration of ML into healthcare, such models may be readily incorporated into clinical practice and guide benchmarking efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanaiha et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: