Key result
Physicians and patients diverge on PCI informed consent, with physicians citing poor patient comprehension.
Why the study?
What are the attitudes and experiences of patients and physicians regarding informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cross-Sectional (n=391)
What are the attitudes and experiences of patients and physicians regarding informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention?
p-value: p=0.014
Patients require education on the purpose of informed consent prior to receiving detailed information about PCI to improve comprehension and compliance.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most popular invasive cardiovascular procedures performed worldwide. However, patients often overestimate its benefits or underestimate potential risks, which should be addressed during informed consent (IC). In light of this, our study aimed to explore in greater depth the attitudes and experiences with IC regarding PCI in South Korea. METHODS: This mixed-methods study employed a sequential design following the guidelines of the Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation and Health Sciences. Between December 2022 and January 2023, a cross-sectional survey was completed by 255 patients and 136 physicians. From February to April 2023, in-depth interviews were conducted with 13 physicians were conducted and analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: = 0.014; mean patient rank 185.5, mean physician rank 214.3) information during the IC process. Physicians experienced difficulties due to patients' low comprehension of the information provided during the IC process. CONCLUSION: Patients should first be educated on the purpose of IC to prepare them for receiving detailed information about PCI. When they are ready to accept information, strategies suggested by several studies may be applied to improve their understanding. This step-by-step provision of information will elevate patient compliance with IC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=391). Informed consent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention was evaluated on Attitudes and experiences with informed consent regarding PCI (p=0.014). Attitudes toward informed consent for PCI differed between patients and physicians (P=0.014), with physicians reporting difficulties due to patients' low comprehension of the provided information.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: