Why the study?
Myocardial fibrosis marks the decline toward heart failure in aortic stenosis, but does not yet represent a key element in its prognostic and therapeutic framework.
Does the assessment of myocardial fibrosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improve prognostic stratification and optimize the timing of valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does the assessment of myocardial fibrosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improve prognostic stratification and optimize the timing of valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Myocardial fibrosis assessment by CMR (LGE and T1 mapping) is emerging as a powerful prognostic tool to guide the timing of valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis.
LGE by CMR should not yet guide valve replacement timing in severe aortic stenosis; leaves open its role in prospective risk stratification.
The pressure overload due to the progressive narrowing of the valve area determines the development of the left ventricular hypertrophy which characterizes aortic stenosis (AS). The onset of myocardial fibrosis marks the inexorable decline of an initially compensatory response towards heart failure. However, myocardial fibrosis does not yet represent a key element in the prognostic and therapeutic framework of AS. In this context, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging plays a major role by highlighting both the focal irreversible fibrotic replacement, using the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique, and the earlier diffuse reversible interstitial fibrosis, using the T1 mapping techniques. For this reason, the presence of myocardial fibrosis would be useful to identify a subgroup of patients at greater risk of events among the subjects with severe AS. Actually, more and more evidences seem to identify the presence of LGE as a powerful prognostic factor to be used to optimize the timing of prosthetic valve replacement. Randomized clinical trials, such as the EVoLVeD trial currently underway, will be needed to better define the importance of myocardial fibrosis assessment in the management of patients with AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castrichini et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: