Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article investigates a number of conceptual and empirical issues relating to the ambiguity of the concept ‘civility’. By asking what kind of problems ‘civility’ was a response to, it highlights the ambiguity of the concept in a long-term historical context and demonstrates this in a number of key areas for twentieth-century European history: the relationship between civility and violence, civility and the un-making of death, civility and recognition, civility and subjectivity, as well as the dynamic relationship between inclusion and exclusion that characterises the practice of civility particularly in colonial and post-colonial contexts. It then develops a number of themes highlighted by the use of ‘civility’ as a historical concept, arguing that contemporary meanings of the concept has to be incorporated in empirical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holger Nehring (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: