PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1986California Management Review789 citations

Changing Patterns of International Competition

View Full Paper
MPMichael E. PorterBoston University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

What does international competition mean for competitive strategy? While there is an ample literature on the problems of becoming a multinational, the specific strategic needs of established multinationals requires closer examination in light of the increasingly competitive international environment. We need to distinguish between multidomestic industries and global industries. If American firms are to catch up with the Japanese, they must strive to achieve global platforms rather than engage in competition on a country-by-country basis. A global strategy requires that a firm rebalance the configuration and coordination of its activities so that comparative as well as competitive advantage is achieved. The increasing globalization of international competition requires strategic responses that overcome country parochialism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michael E. Porter (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc1cd69a4af5b15a8f211https://doi.org/10.2307/41165182
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper