Why the study?
The diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in early stages is challenging.
Can electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) detect epicardial conduction changes in ARVC patients and healthy mutation-carriers compared to controls?
Can electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) detect epicardial conduction changes in ARVC patients and healthy mutation-carriers compared to controls?
Electrocardiographic imaging can detect localized delayed right ventricular epicardial conduction in ARVC patients and healthy mutation carriers, potentially serving as an early diagnostic marker.
ECGI conduction differences seen in ARVC; hypothesis-generating for early detection, needs prospective validation before any clinical role.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in early stages is challenging. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) can detect epicardial conduction changes in ARVC patients and healthy mutation-carriers (M-carriers). METHOD: Twelve ARVC patients, 20 M-carriers and 8 controls underwent 12-lead ECG, signal-averaged ECG, 2-dimensional echocardiography, 24-hours Holter monitoring and ECGI (body surface mapping and computer tomography with offline analysis of reconstructed epicardial signals). Total and Right Ventricular Activation Time (tVAT and RVAT respectively), area of Ventricular Activation during the terminal 20 milliseconds (aVAte20) and the activation patterns were compared between groups. RESULTS: In ARVC patients the locations of aVAte20 were scattered or limited to smaller parts of the right ventricle (RV) versus in controls, in whom aVAte20 was confined to right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and left ventricle (LV) base (+/- RV base). ARVC patients had smaller aVAte20 (35cm2 vs 87cm2, p<0.05), longer tVAT (99msec vs 58msec, p<0.05) and longer RVAT (66msec vs 43msec, p<0.05) versus controls. In 10 M-carriers (50%), the locations of aVAte20 were also eccentric. This sub-group presented smaller aVAte20 (53cm2 vs 87cm2, p = 0.009), longer RVAT (55msec vs 48msec, p = 0.043), but similar tVAT (65msec vs 60msec, p = 0.529) compared with the M-carriers with normal activation pattern. CONCLUSIONS: ECGI can detect epicardial conduction abnormalities in ARVC patients. Moreover, the observation of localized delayed RV epicardial conduction in M-carriers suggests an early stage of ARVC and may be a useful diagnostic marker enhancing an early detection of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kommata et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: