PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1988Circulation180 citations

Nonuniform recovery of excitability in the left ventricle.

View Full Paper
JVJoseph A. VassalloDCDennis M. CassidyKKK. Elizabeth Kindwall

Structured PICO

How do left ventricular activation, dispersion of refractoriness, and total recovery time differ among normal patients, patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia, and patients with long QT syndrome?

P
Population
18 patients: 7 with no heart disease and no arrhythmia (Group 1), 6 with previous infarction and sustained ventricular tachycardia (Group 2), and 5 with prolonged QT interval and previous cardiac arrest (Group 3).
I
Intervention
Left ventricular endocardial catheter mapping and left ventricular refractory period determination
C
Comparator
Comparison among the three groups (normal vs. CAD/VT vs. Long QT syndrome)
O
Outcome
Left ventricular activation, dispersion of refractoriness, and total recovery timesurrogate

Patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia, as well as those with long QT syndrome, exhibit significantly greater dispersion of total recovery time compared to normal patients, indicating nonuniform recovery of excitability.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine left ventricular activation, dispersion of refractoriness, and total recovery time in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia and in patients with the long QT syndrome and to compare these patients with a group of normal patients. Left ventricular endocardial catheter mapping and left ventricular refractory period determination were performed in 18 patients. Group 1 consisted of seven patients with no heart disease and no arrhythmia; group 2 consisted of six patients with previous infarction and sustained ventricular tachycardia; and group 3 consisted of five patients with prolonged QT interval and previous cardiac arrest. Total left ventricular endocardial activation was significantly longer in group 2 (75 +/- 23 msec, mean +/- SD) compared with group 1 (34 +/- 9 msec, p less than 0.01) and group 3 (42 +/- 5 msec, p less than 0.05). Dispersion of refractoriness was significantly greater in group 3 (87 +/- 27 msec) than in group 1 (40 +/- 14 msec, p less than 0.01) and group 2 (53 +/- 14 msec, p less than 0.05). Dispersion of total recovery time was significantly greater in group 2 (90 +/- 30 msec) than in group 1 (52 +/- 14 msec, p less than 0.05) as well as group 3 (114 +/- 43 msec) compared with group 1 (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vassallo et al. (1988) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc259ea84844e355ee6ebhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.78.6.1365
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper