Why the study?
Stress perfusion-CMR remains limited in patients with implantable devices, leaving its safety, image quality, and diagnostic value in those with MR-conditional transvenous PPM or ICD unclear.
Is adenosine stress-CMR safe and diagnostically valuable in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers or ICDs?
Is adenosine stress-CMR safe and diagnostically valuable in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers or ICDs?
Adenosine stress perfusion-CMR is safe and provides good diagnostic image quality in patients with MR-conditional transvenous pacemakers and ICDs.
Supports safety and diagnostic utility of adenosine stress-CMR with MR-conditional devices; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The use of stress perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging remains limited in patients with implantable devices. The primary goal of the study was to assess the safety, image quality, and the diagnostic value of stress perfusion-CMR in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). METHODS: Consecutive patients with a transvenous PPM or ICD referred for adenosine stress-CMR were enrolled in this single-center longitudinal study. The CMR protocol was performed using a 1.5 T system according to current guidelines while all devices were put in MR-mode. Quality of cine, late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE), and stress perfusion sequences were assessed. An ischemia burden of ≥ 1.5 segments was considered significant. We assessed the safety, image quality and the occurrence of interference of the magnetic field with the implantable device. In case of ischemia, we also assessed the correlation with the presence of significant coronary lesions on coronary angiography. RESULTS: Among 3743 perfusion-CMR examinations, 66 patients had implantable devices (1.7%). Image quality proved diagnostic in 98% of cases. No device damage or malfunction was reported immediately and at 1 year. Fifty patients were continuously paced during CMR. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure remained unchanged during adenosine stress, while diastolic blood pressure decreased (p = 0.007). Six patients (9%) had an ischemia-positive stress CMR and significant coronary stenoses were confirmed by coronary angiography in all cases. CONCLUSION: Stress perfusion-CMR is safe, allows reliable ischemia detection, and provides good diagnostic value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavon et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: