Why the study?
Does the combination of atrial late potentials and pathological chemoreflexsensitivity predict the onset of atrial fibrillation?
Does the combination of atrial late potentials and pathological chemoreflexsensitivity predict the onset of atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While the combination of atrial late potentials and pathological chemoreflexsensitivity significantly increases the risk of developing atrial fibrillation, its predictive power is insufficient for routine clinical risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common arrhythmia that often causes the serious complication of a stroke. OBJECT: The aim was to evaluate the utility of pathological chemoreflexsensitivity (PCHRS) and atrial late potentials (ALP) to predict AF in follow-up. METHODS: We investigated a prospective study on the basis of our observation about a PCHRS and ALP in paroxysmal AF. The PCHRS was predefined as a chemoreflexsensitivity below 3.0 ms/mmHg and ALP were predefined as a filtered P-wave duration > or =120 ms and a root mean square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P-wave < or =3.5 microV. A P-wave triggered P-wave signal averaged electrocardiograph (ECG) and chemoreflexsensitivity was performed on 250 consecutive patients who were divided into four groups. Group I consisted of patients with ALP and PCHRS, patients of group II had only ALP, a PCHRS was only present in group III, and patients of group IV had neither ALP nor PCHRS. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up of 37.8 months AF was observed in 10 patients (4%). The patients of the four groups were similar according to clinical baseline characteristics. The incidence of AF was higher in group I (18% of patients) than in group II (6% of patients, P = 0.229) and significantly higher than in group III (3% of patients, P = 0.034) or group IV (1% of patients, P < 0.0001). Patients with ALP and PCHRS showed a 33-fold risk (P < 0.001) for the onset AF. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the probability of AF could be predicted with a P-wave signal averaged ECG and an analysis of chemoreflexsensitivity. The predictive power of the combination of ALP and PCHRS seemed not high enough for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budeus et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: