Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A recent paper proposed an item-selection approach for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) in which the psychometric information per time unit is maximized. The current research extended this methodology to adaptive tests combined with use of a cognitive diagnostic model (CDM). Two new item-selection methods are introduced for the combination of CDMs and CAT: posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler information per-time-unit, and mutual information per-time-unit. These methods were compared with standard procedures in which the amount of time required to complete an item is not considered. Simulation conditions with and without attribute-balancing constraints indicated that, on average, the new methods required more items but took less time than the standard procedures, while achieving comparable classification accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finkelman et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: