Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Clinical Significance: Evaluations of interventions for sexual orientation obsessive–compulsive disorder (SO-OCD) are rare. This study therefore evaluated the effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT). Case Presentation: A 28-year-old heterosexual male presented with SO-OCD in the form of obsessions concerning his sexual identity and associated avoidance and reassurance-seeking compulsions. The evaluation was a quasi-experiential A/B single-case experimental design (SCED) with follow-up of the eight-session CAT intervention. The SCED had three phases: baseline ‘A’ (two sessions; 21 days), active treatment ‘B’ (six sessions; 56 days) and follow-up (one session; 44 days). There were seven daily rated idiographic outcome measures (intrusion count as the control, a compulsion count and then intensity measures of checking, worrying, generating evidence, shame and anxiety). Four nomothetic outcome measures (including a primary outcome measure of SO-OCD) were collected at assessment, end of treatment and follow-up. Generalised logistical models were fitted to the idiographic outcomes. Six of the seven idiographic measures responded to treatment, indicating an effective intervention. Idiographic change was non-linear and synchronised with specific psychotherapeutic actions and there was no evidence of relapse. There was a clinically significant and reliable pre–post reduction in SO-OCD with progress sustained over the follow-up period. Conclusions: Overall, the study indicates that CAT was an effective intervention for the SO-OCD. The study methodology is critiqued and guidance on SO-OCD treatment is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osivwemu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: