Why the study?
The relationship of glycemic abnormalities between patients with primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension remains debatable.
Does primary aldosteronism increase the risk of glycemic abnormalities compared to essential hypertension in adult patients?
Does primary aldosteronism increase the risk of glycemic abnormalities compared to essential hypertension in adult patients?
Patients with primary aldosteronism have a significantly higher risk of glycemic abnormalities, including diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance, compared to those with essential hypertension.
May warrant glycemic monitoring in PA; confirms higher risk of abnormalities versus essential hypertension.
Background: The relationship of glycemic abnormalities between primary aldosteronism (PA) patients and essential hypertension (EH) patients is still debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to explore differences in the prevalence of glycemic abnormalities and levels of abnormal glucose metabolism in PA and EH patients. Methods: databases from their inception through January 2022. Inclusion criteria for this study were 1) observational studies which contained specific data of interest, 2) studies including data which compared adult PA and EH patients and 3) studies which used appropriate methods to diagnose PA. Risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated. Results: Twenty-six studies involving 53,186 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with PA demonstrated significantly higher overall incidence of glycemic abnormalities than patients with EH [RR 1.54; 95% CI (1.20,1.98)]. Risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in PA patients were higher than in EH patients [RR 1.27; 95%CI (1.08, 1.49) and RR 2.99; 95%CI (1.74, 5.16), respectively]. There was no statistically significant difference of risk between these groups for impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [RR 1.70; 95%CI (0.55, 5.26)]. Moderate heterogeneity was observed in overall glycemic abnormalities outcomes. A high level of heterogeneity was observed for IFG, while the level was low for DM and IGT. Conclusions: PA patients have a higher risk of glycemic abnormalities than in EH patients. Further study should be conducted to investigate underlying mechanisms of glycemic abnormalities in PA. Systematic Review Registration: www.inplasy.com, INPLASY, identifier 202220004.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manosroi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: