Why the study?
To compare leukocyte recruitment and function after cardiac injury between non-regenerative and regenerative systems and encourage improved immune cell tools and targets for therapy development.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The review highlights differences in leukocyte persistence between regenerative and non-regenerative models after myocardial infarction, suggesting immune cell clearance as a potential therapeutic target for cardiac repair.
Innate and adaptive leukocytes rapidly mobilize to ischemic tissues after myocardial infarction in response to damage signals released from necrotic cells. Leukocytes play important roles in cardiac repair and regeneration such as inflammation initiation and resolution; the removal of dead cells and debris; the deposition of the extracellular matrix and granulation tissue; supporting angiogenesis and cardiomyocyte proliferation; and fibrotic scar generation and resolution. By organizing and comparing the present knowledge of leukocyte recruitment and function after cardiac injury in non-regenerative to regenerative systems, we propose that the leukocyte response to cardiac injury differs in non-regenerative adult mammals such as humans and mice in comparison to cardiac regenerative models such as neonatal mice and adult zebrafish. Specifically, extensive neutrophil, macrophage, and T-cell persistence contributes to a lengthy inflammatory period in non-regenerative systems for adverse cardiac remodeling and heart failure development, whereas their quick removal supports inflammation resolution in regenerative systems for new contractile tissue formation and coronary revascularization. Surprisingly, other leukocytes have not been examined in regenerative model systems. With this review, we aim to encourage the development of improved immune cell markers and tools in cardiac regenerative models for the identification of new immune targets in non-regenerative systems to develop new therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peterson et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: