Why the study?
Evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of at-home blood pressure self-monitoring compared with traditional monitoring in clinical settings remained unclear.
Does at-home blood pressure self-monitoring improve cost-effectiveness compared to clinical-setting monitoring in patients with hypertension?
Does at-home blood pressure self-monitoring improve cost-effectiveness compared to clinical-setting monitoring in patients with hypertension?
At-home blood pressure monitoring, particularly when combined with team-based care or using 24-hour continuous measurements, is a cost-effective long-term strategy for hypertension management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports HBPM integration into hypertension care for value; extends economic evidence with long-term systematic confirmation.
Hayek et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: