I calculate Fourier-Bessel expansion coefficients for recorded shallow-seismic wavefields using a discrete approximation to the Bessel transformation. This is the first stage of a fullwavefield inversion. The transform is a complete representation of the data, recorded waveforms can be reconstructed from the expansion coefficients obtained. In a second stage (described in a companion paper) I infer a 1-D model of the subsurface from these transforms and P-wave arrival times by fitting them with their synthetic counterpart. The whole procedure avoids dealing with dispersion in terms of normal modes, but exploits the full signal-content, including the dispersion of higher modes, leaky modes and their true amplitudes. It is robust even in the absence of a priori information. I successfully apply it to the near field of the source. And it is more efficient than direct inversion of seismograms. I have developed this new approach because the inversion of shallow-seismic Rayleigh waves suffers from the interference of multiple modes that are present in the majority of our field data sets. Since even the fundamental-mode signal cannot be isolated in the time domain, conventional phase-difference techniques are not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Forbriger (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: