Background and Aim: Psychosocial health inequities among Roma communities experiencing poverty remain poorly synthesized. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and characterize psychosocial health outcomes and needs in these communities. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection were searched (2011–2023) for peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative studies on psychosocial health among Roma individuals living in poverty. Eligibility criteria were defined using a modified PICO framework: Population = Roma communities in contexts of poverty; Intervention/exposure = diagnostic, preventive, or comparative psychosocial health assessments or interventions; Outcomes = indicators of mental health, well-being, stigma, discrimination, and psychosocial functioning. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists, and the certainty of the evidence was summarized according to the GRADE approach. Results: Eleven studies were included (five with exclusively Roma samples and six with mixed samples), comprising 13,222 Roma participants. Most studies used nonrandomized, cross-sectional, diagnostic or descriptive designs; only one was longitudinal with an intervention component. Approximately 90% of studies met ≥ 75% of the JBI criteria, and the overall certainty of the evidence on psychosocial health was predominantly moderate. Across studies, Roma participants consistently reported poorer psychosocial health than the majority-group participants and high levels of internalized and experienced stigma. Conclusions: Although limited, the available evidence consistently indicates a substantial burden of psychosocial health problems among Roma communities experiencing poverty, shaped by structural disadvantage and stigma. The scarcity of rigorous psychological research underscores the need for longitudinal, community-engaged studies and interventions informed by equity-oriented public policies. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023476860.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ledo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: