Why the study?
Does cisplatin plus epirubicin reduce cardiotoxicity and maintain efficacy compared to cisplatin plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer?
Does cisplatin plus epirubicin reduce cardiotoxicity and maintain efficacy compared to cisplatin plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer?
Cisplatin plus epirubicin provides a more favorable therapeutic index than cisplatin plus doxorubicin in advanced ovarian cancer due to similar survival and reduced cardiotoxicity.
Favors cisplatin/epirubicin over cisplatin/doxorubicin in advanced ovarian cancer to reduce cardiotoxicity; confirms equivalent efficacy.
Stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients were prospectively randomized to receive eight courses of 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin plus either 75 mg/m2 of epirubicin (62 patients) or 60 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (54 patients). Clinical response rates for cisplatin/epirubicin of 42% [15% complete response (CR) and 27% partial response (PR)] and for cisplatin/doxorubicin of 55% (24% CR and 31% PR) were not statistically different (p = 0.14). The negative second look rate was 35% (10/29) for cisplatin/doxorubicin and 17% (5/30) for cisplatin/epirubicin (p = 0.12). The progression-free interval for cisplatin/epirubicin (13 months) was not statistically different (p = 0.09) from that for cisplatin/doxorubicin (19 months). The median survivals for cisplatin/epirubicin (756 days) and cisplatin/doxorubicin (739 days) were similar (p = 0.70). Cardiotoxicity was greater for the cisplatin/doxorubicin group (p = 0.0003). With similar survival and less cardiotoxicity, the cisplatin/epirubicin regimen had the more favorable therapeutic index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Homesley et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: