Key result
Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 did not improve response rates, response duration (8 vs 10 months), or survival (10 vs 12 months) compared to doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 in advanced breast cancer.
Why the study?
Does epirubicin improve response rates, response duration, or survival compared to doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer?
RCT (n=141)
Does epirubicin improve response rates, response duration, or survival compared to doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer?
Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 does not offer an efficacy or toxicity advantage over doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer.
Equitoxic doxorubicin and epirubicin yield similar responses; leaves open optimal anthracycline selection in advanced breast cancer.
One hundred forty-one patients with advanced breast cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. These doses were selected to produce equivalent toxicities. All patients were assessed for toxicity, and 138 patients were assessable for response. After a median of five treatment cycles, 47% (32 of 68) of doxorubicin-treated patients achieved a partial or complete response. Response duration and survival were 10 and 12 months for doxorubicin and 8 and 10 months for epirubicin, respectively. Noncardiac toxicities were similar for both drugs. Of 41 patients receiving doxorubicin who had serial left ventricular ejection fraction assessments, seven sustained a fall of 10% or more, and one patient developed congestive cardiac failure at a cumulative doxorubicin dose of 489 mg/m2. Of 39 patients receiving epirubicin who had serial cardiac assessments, five sustained left ventricular ejection fraction falls of 10% or more and two patients developed congestive cardiac failure at cumulative doses of 178 mg/m2 and 833 mg/m2. These data indicate that an epirubicin dose of 90 mg/m2 produces toxicity equivalent to doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 but does not improve response rates, response duration, or survival in advanced breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pérez et al. (1991) conducted an RCT in advanced breast cancer (n=141). Epirubicin vs. Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was evaluated on Partial or complete response. Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 did not improve response rates, response duration (8 vs 10 months), or survival (10 vs 12 months) compared to doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 in advanced breast cancer.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: