This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In the maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets T₁, …, Tₘ of a universe $[n]$ along with an integer k and the objective is to find a subset S ⊆ [m] of size k that maximizes C(S) := |i ∈ S Tᵢ|. It is a classic result that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an optimal approximation ratio of 1-e⁻¹. In this work we consider a generalization of this problem wherein an element a can contribute by an amount that depends on the number of times it is covered. Given a concave, nondecreasing function $φ$, we define C^φ(S) := ∑a ∈ [n]wₐφ(|S|ₐ), where |S|ₐ = | ∈ S : a ∈ Tᵢ\|. The standard maximum coverage problem corresponds to taking φ(j) = min,1\. For any such $φ$, we provide an efficient algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio equal to the Poisson concavity ratio of $φ$, defined by α_φ := minx ∈ N^* E[φ(Poi(x))]/φ(E[Poi(x)]). Complementing this approximation guarantee, we establish a matching NP-hardness result when $φ$ grows in a sublinear way. As special cases, we improve the result of [Barman et al., IPCO, 2020] about maximum multi-coverage, that was based on the unique games conjecture, and we recover the result of [Dudycz et al., IJCAI, 2020] on multi-winner approval-based voting for geometrically dominant rules. Our result goes beyond these special cases and we illustrate it with applications to distributed resource allocation problems, welfare maximization problems and approval-based voting for general rules.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barman et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: