The endurance/retention performance of HfO 2 / Metal cap RRAM devices in a 1T1R configuration shows metal cap dependence. For Hf and Ti caps, owning strong thermodynamic ability of extracting oxygen from HfO 2 , long pulse endurance (>10 10 cycles) could be achieved. For Ta cap, owning lower thermodynamic ability of extracting oxygen from HfO 2 , better retention can be achieved. Therefore, an endurance/retention performance tradeoff is identified on the 40 nm × 40 nm HfO 2 /Metal cap bipolar RRAM devices. The tradeoff of endurance/retention performance can be explained by a different filament constriction shape depending on metal cap layer as derived from fitting I - V curves in the quantum point contact model. This difference in filament constriction shape is attributed to the thermodynamics difference of metal cap: Hf and Ti have a stronger thermodynamical ability to extract oxygen from HfO 2 than Ta. The possibility of tuning the intrinsic reliability performance by changing the cap materials paves a way for optimizing the operation of RRAM devices into the desired specifics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: