Why the study?
Deep neural networks for ECG classification are susceptible to adversarial examples and generalize poorly, with no existing architecture capable of simultaneously detecting adversarial examples and classifying arrhythmia.
Does ECG-Adv-GAN improve normal/abnormal ECG signal detection compared to other classification models in ECG signals?
Does ECG-Adv-GAN improve normal/abnormal ECG signal detection compared to other classification models in ECG signals?
A novel Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (ECG-Adv-GAN) can simultaneously generate ECG signals and detect cardiac abnormalities, outperforming existing models against adversarial examples.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition requires an automated system and analysis pipeline for understanding specific rhythm irregularities. Deep neural networks have become a popular technique for tracing ECG signals, outperforming human experts. Despite this, convolutional neural networks are susceptible to adversarial examples that can misclassify ECG signals and decrease the model’s precision. Moreover, they do not generalize well on the out-of-distribution dataset. The GAN architecture has been employed in recent works to synthesize adversarial ECG signals to increase existing training data. However, they use a disjointed CNN-based classification architecture to detect arrhythmia. Till now, no versatile architecture has been proposed that can detect adversarial examples and classify arrhythmia simultaneously. To alleviate this, we propose a novel Conditional Generative Adversarial Network to simultaneously generate ECG signals for different categories and detect cardiac abnormalities. Moreover, the model is conditioned on class-specific ECG signals to synthesize realistic adversarial examples. Consequently, we compare our architecture and show how it outperforms other classification models in normal/abnormal ECG signal detection by benchmarking real world and adversarial signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossain et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: