Comparative analysis evaluates text vectorization methods for binary classification performance, suggesting varied effectiveness.
Text vectorization is indispensable for natural language processing (NLP). It allows us to transform text—from comments, reviews, documents, and even complete books—into formats or values that we can use as input in machine learning (ML) models. In this article, we present a comparative analysis between some of these methods used for text vectorization. The general purpose is to identify which of these methods offers a superior performance when applied together with some classification models on binary classification datasets. Each vectorization method, in combination with the models used, is evaluated by standard metrics in machine learning, such as Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score and area under the curve (Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)) for a robust evaluation, demonstrating that the newest and most complex vectorization methods are not necessarily better for all binary classification tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopez-Robles et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: